Quantcast
Channel: Docutastic
Viewing all 48 articles
Browse latest View live

The Endless Summer (1966)

$
0
0

Classic documentary from the 60s which now is remembered by many as a blissfull ode to a bygone era. Two all American boys Mike Hynson and Robert August take a gap year, before "gap years" were invented. They pursue a year round summer, chasing the season around the world looking for surf spots and commenting on the cultures they encounter, followed by filmmaker and narrator Bruce Brown. If one had enough time and money it would be possible to follow the summer around the world, and why not! Watched through today's eyes much of it is racist and sexist, and I don't think that can be ignored. But the intent is clearly not malicious and instead the casual style of Brown's narration with light tongue-in-cheek humour and with the breezy soundtrack, can, if you let it, instill a real sense of peace as the careless dreamers skirt with ease across the waves.

The route takes them initially onto the west coast of Africa. Senegal, Ghana and Nigeria where few white people had been seen in the seaside towns, and no surfing had ever been witnessed. The clean-cut young men engage well with the locals, referred to as "natives", and when the crowds gather even lend their boards to some of the men, referred to as "heavies". The narrator remarks with surprise that one of the men even stands up on his first wave which is practically unheard of. But references to their "primitive" lifestyles and the risk of "being eaten" are never far away. 

The trip moves onto apartheid South Africa which is notable for the vast empty spaces and deserted highways. Having come from beaches crowded with black faces, the total lack of non-whites at Table Mountain or on the beaches is an odd contrast but is not commented on directly. There is an intriguing reference to the white South Africans preferring to all travel together to the same beach, even with hundreds of miles of alternatives not being used. Brown seems bemused by this, but offers no explanation why they prefer to risk tens of riders on the same wave rather than spread themselves more thinly. Later a more direct reference is made at a shark-infested beach when a group of porpoises appear. "Sharks and porpoises have yet to integrate in South Africa". The film is much better, though, for avoiding political commentary. The USA was hardly a bastion of integration and racial harmony at the time. 

It is also in South Africa that they make the discovery that has characterised the film since for many surfing enthusiasts. They trek and ride their boards over half a mile or so of sand dunes to find St Francis beach, and the perfect wave. A pipe-shaped wave of 5-10 feet which rolls into the beach over perhaps 100 or 200 feet, 300 days a year. Like it is being made by a machine! Brown comments deliciously, "Imagine what it looks like on St Francis beach right now", a reference as valid today as at the time it was first shown, prompting the realization that though the film is 50 years old, the waves are ancient. 


Much like Pumping Iron (1977), the Endless Summer kickstarted a craze globally and many surf spots, including St Francis above, are now world famous and in fact seriously overcrowded. Watching the film, it is very easy to understand how it could become so influential. The carefree lifestyle is remarkably attractive. The stars themselves are mute as the entire movie was recorded on 16 mm film with no audio; its almost an extended dream sequence. Waimea in Hawaii had been ridden only for a few years at this point, later Riding Giants (2004) would lay out the development of this lifestyle into the professionally competitive big wave riding that we see today. And the gap year dream is still alive and well. Robert August now lives in Costa Rica and runs a blog, "One of these days I hope to go back and surf this beautiful wave..."

Trailer on youtube!



Unforgivable Blackness (2004)

$
0
0
 

Before there was Muhammed Ali, there was Jack Johnson. Ken Burns' documentary presents James Earl Jones, Keith David, Samuel L Jackson and Alan Rickman portraying the phenomenal story of the first black world heavyweight* boxing champion. He was a highly skilled boxer, head and shoulders above the rest of his generation, but he was a black man challenging white supremacy and even worse, he liked white women. The result was a combustible mix and one destined to drive even the most headstrong character to the very edge, but not before he had lived his life exactly how he chose to.
 

He fought with a languid standing style with fast hands and an Ali-esque lean, relying on his speed to avoid punches rather than blocking them. His stamina was usually the difference when fights were competitive, but selection of opponents was the main theme of his career. The leading white fighters would not face him as they considered the black man beneath them. Poorer white fighters and black fighters weren't enough to challenge him, but they were a paycheck as long as the fight was credible and punters could gamble. The result was long, staged, awkward fights. The best moment was when one of these stooges took a real swing against Johnson, perhaps out of boredom rather than anything else. Johnson, stunned, quickly recovers and turns his fury on his fraudulent conspirator, immediately knocking him out.

James Jeffries was the undisputed white champion, but refused to offer Johnson a shot, instead sending racial slurs and offensive comments his way. Post retirement as unbeaten champ, his successor as white champion, Burns, was drawn into a match with Johnson for a $30k purse. Johnson had waited years for the opportunity to win the World Championship belt and did not disappoint. Police stopped the fight and the title was awarded to Johnson on the referee's decision of knockout.

But victory and a title were not enough. The white public and press clamored for James Jeffries, the "Great White Hope" to reclaim the title for the white race. Meanwhile Johnson drove his fast cars and flaunted his relationships with white women. Finally, after several poorer white boxers had failed to trouble the champion, Jefferies agreed to come out of retirement setting up the "Fight of the Century".


However, the "Fight of the Century" in 1910 was almost as one sided as the fake fights. Following the years of racial abuse, Johnson was in no mood to end it quickly, and at times, Johnson visibly holds Jeffries on his feet to prevent him falling and the fight finishing. He was many years older than Johnson, and had not been able to recover his fitness or his strength, but afterwards he painfully admitted, "I couldn't have hit him. No, I couldn't have reached him in 1,000 years." Police stopped the fight and ordered the film cameras to stop running. The white world was spared the film of the great champion being knocked out.

But again victory was not enough. Unable to beat him in the ring, he was chased in the courts under whatever charge was remotely possible, no matter how bizarre. He was eventually convicted under the Mann Act for "transporting women across state lines for immoral purposes". Effectively white slaving. He had regularly traveled with his white female companions, often prostitutes though they did develop into long term relationships to places like Atlantic City for some fun. Eventually he was convicted, despite the acts having occured many years before the Mann Act was made law. His association with white women had been his undoing.

Skipping bail, he fled to Canada, then France. However, the impact of this loss was significant. Until this point he believed that no matter how many people hated him or how many attacks appeared, if his fists did the talking in the ring and he had money in his pocket, nothing else mattered. He was wrong ... in the end his freedom could be stolen from him. Years later he gave himself up and served a year in prison.


The story of his life was adapted into a play called the Great White Hope (later also a film), starring James Earl Jones. Muhammed Ali saw it in New York - the parallels could hardly have been clearer. Reportedly he went back several times to see the play, and later the film. Johnson's desire to live his own life despite the constant assaults, and his demands to be truly free were a direct inspiration. He simply did what he wanted, within the law, but was persecuted to the ends of the earth.

Incredible story of course, but this is also a really well made film with high quality talent throughout. Huge respect in particular for Samuel L Jackson and Alan Rickman. Ken Burns has subsequently led a charge to have Johnson formally pardoned. Obama will very likely do so before the end of his second term. Remarkable life, and remarkable to see how racism could permeate absolutely everything. This is another amazing film on youtube for free!

9 / 10



* Joe Gans was the first black champ, he was World Lightweight Champion from 1902 - 1908

One Night In Turin (2010)

$
0
0

Agh, just the thought of reliving that night is absolutely unbearable. For those too young, or too non English to have hidden behind the sofa during our only semi final exit in World Cup history, I imagine this documentary cannot quite have the same emotional resonance. Five stepped up to take their place in history and the two that missed their penalties will never forgive themselves. But the face forever etched across the history of this tournament is not their's but the enigmatic genius Geordie youngster Paul Gascoigne who due to a badly timed challenge already knew that he would not represent his country in the World Cup Final. He made it ok to be English, a man, and cry. None of that stiff upper lip rubbish. Peter Bradshaw wrote about how this became the basis for the acceptable emotional outpouring at Diana's funeral years later, and doubtless the national euphoria at the 2012 Olympics. 


Narrated by Gary Oldman, who's career was launched playing a hooligan in The Firm (1989), the story follows the hooligan culture of English football fans on the one hand, and the abusive nature of the press' coverage of the team on the other. The team were trapped in the eye of the storm, and Bobby Robson the manager was there to shoulder the pressure. It nearly breaks him a number of times, but he keeps calm and carries on. He's at the pinnacle of his profession and nobody is going to take that away from him, at least not until after the tournament.


The English squad is strong. Not as strong as others, but strong enough to do well. Expectations are always going to be higher than reality though and the team understands that England expects. Each team has its talisman and Gascoigne is ours. Young, fresh, untainted. A battler with the skill and balance to compare with the best in the world. But with the poor temperament of someone who hasn't yet been there and done it. He would either win it for us or throw it all away in a silly moment with a big grin on his face. Bobby is his father figure, but can he cope with the pressure enough to shield young Gazza and provide him with the the opportunity he was born for?


And so the story plays out with behind-the-scenes footage and on-the-sidelines reaction shots, until we are left with Lothar Matthäus with his arm draped around Chris Waddle's shoulder in consolation. Not the slickest documentary ever made and perhaps also not one which will work well for those not already emotionally invested in the story. Perhaps unlike Unforgivable Blackness (2004) not enough time has yet passed, or perhaps since its made for an English audience it needs to be an insider's exposition, but for a fan the film captures the emotion brilliantly. Nessun Dorma saved for the very end.. Vincero? Maybe next time

7 / 10

Trailer...


Sick The Life and Death of Bob Flanagan, Supermasochist (1997) (NSFW)

$
0
0

Bob Flanagan was a BDSM celebrity. Diagnosed with cystic fibrosis as a child, he was expected to live to 7 or 8. Treatment for his condition involved removing vast amounts of thick, viscous mucus from throughout his body, in particular from his lungs. The procedures caused enormous and consistent pain. At some stage this extreme and consistent pain intermingled with his sexual desire, leaving his with severe masochistic tendancies. Perhaps a method of bringing control back, to experience pain willingly rather than at the whim of the disease. His battered and bruised body resulted in an extremely high tolerance for pain, and the repeated predictions of his own demise gave him no fear for his own safety. Truly a supermasochist, his life became an art installation. The film documents his lifelong struggle with the disease, his extreme sexual appetites and his eventual death. Flanagan agreed to participate only under the condition that his death would be covered.


The film forces you to engage with his world visually. While it can't make you take your clothes off and be publicly whipped and humiliated, it can repeatedly confront you with his naked, bloody body. The demonstrations do not end there, though, and the disgusting fecal displays in particular are persistent and extremely graphic. I debated what to show as a representation of this, noting that reading commentary on a documentary does not imply willingness to be exposed to its content. However, being forced to confront your interpretation of this sexual behaviour is an essential part of Bob's aim in participating. Is it an unnatural perversion? Perhaps, but if so the cause is almost certainly linked to a pitiful, wildly disadvantaged childhood, then what right does anyone have to judge the outcome. 

He shares his life with Sheree Rose, a sexual sadist who helps Bob explore his deepest desires. The vocabulary of their relationship is very difficult to relate to. He is her fulltime slave, but as he physically deteriorates and their role playing conflicts with his suffering, the torture becomes an offer rather than a order. She both wants to help him to feel better in the only way that either of them know how, and still wants to play the role that he has committed to her. Rose became a part of his private and public life as she participated more and more in his "art". But as he gets closer to death, she complains that "he isn't really a masochist any more, as the pain he lives with already is so intense".

His contribution back to society is admirable. He works as a camp counselor for children with cystic fibrosis. He also meets a terminally ill 18 year old girl who has asked to meet him under the Make-A-Wish Foundation. Her interest is not purely platonic, however, which she expresses to the frustration of her mother who clearly is affected as much by her comfort with dying as by the disease itself. There is an odd scene where she has her nipples pierced with Bob, Sharon watching on barely hiding her jealousy. As she sits in the room with strangers and cameras, topless, squeezing Bob's hand, it is clear that she is getting a kick out of it in ways that her mother (or Make a Wish for that matter) would perhaps not be comfortable.

The film concludes with a performance of his poem "Why" which addresses directly and as completely and honestly as possible the question the viewers will most particularly struggle with. The range of influences is remarkably relatable. Those fairy tales and cartoons where the heros are essentially tortured and the religious myths idealising suffering and martyrdom. The aspirations, particularly provided to boys, to behave like a brave "man" and to take the pain. And the temporary and limited but undeniable pleasure that some basic sexual behaviour can provide.

"Because I had awful stomach aches and holding my penis made me feel better"

"Because my parents loved me even more when I was suffering"

"Because you always hurt the one you love"

Finally over the credits "Fun to be Dead", Bob sings to us from beyond the grave taunting us with his lack of problems now that he has passed on. If documentaries are about seeing an individual life that is familiar but terrifyingly different then this is as significant as Grizzly Man. Even if you don't finish it wanting to be Snow White before she is rescued, you may look at gimp masks differently.

7 / 10

The Filth and the Fury (2000)

$
0
0

The heydey of the Sex Pistols was a confused period. Punk was anti-establishment and anti-wealth, but also anti-popularity. The bigger it became, the more the self-styled founders could not recognise it. So perhaps its fitting that Sid Vicious didn't live to see it become just another part of the mainstream (David Cameron famously claims he listened to them) and Johnny Rotten left just as they were at their most popular. Its odd to think that in their most celebrated form, they only existed from 1975 - 1978. However, the destructive heroin vice that Sid started and Nancy, his prostitute girlfriend encouraged, clearly hurts Johnny to this day. While most of the world thought it was always going to go wrong, Rotten thinks that if he had just been a little less self obsessed that he could have saved his friend. That is the emotional core that brings this film together and with the rare participation of most of the rest of the main figures (most shielding their faces for some reason I couldn't figure out), this film may be the best "authorised" documentary history of the period.

Formed from a group of kids who regularly hung around a fetish clothing shop called SEX on the King's Road, the Pistols' style was both apparently completely random, and somehow consistent. Leather jackets came later as the earliest punks couldn't have afforded them, but shared hate and anger led to clothing and sneers themed on fairly consistent destruction. Much of that was driven by the perceived persecution of the working class, which also led to Rotten replacing band member Matlock, who was just too middle class. Though Matlock's recollection was that their manager, McLaren had sowed the seeds of discontent.

In fact, the conflicting stories of the fall outs and interband fighting has a very "This is Spinal Tap" feel to it. The manipulative, narcissistic manager McLaren and the interfering girlfriend Nancy Spungen preside over the decline. Various labels sign them and kick them out. Interview and newspaper scandals follow but the music is good. "God Save the Queen" becomes the anti-establishment anthem and their popularity rises.

Their US tour is the end of the line. Infighting, Sid's drug use, and some very hostile redneck gigs bring the whole thing crashing down. The animosity felt between the band and the crowd is evident from the film footage. This pushed the "don't care" attitudes of those on stage to the very limit and raises very real questions about what the point is. Its clear that they are in some physical danger here, clashing against a culture that presumably admires their music but might have different interpretation of who the enemy is. Vicious in particular develops a stream of headline grabbing actions, most of which are clearly in response to the reception he gets.


In Texas he calls the crowd a "bunch of faggots" and hits someone with his bass guitar. Later, bleeding from his mouth after being hit by a bottle from the crowd he spits blood at a woman who has climbed onstage. Given he is an intravenous drug user who also lives in his own filth, thats quite an attack. But whether the escalation could have happened without the confrontational crowd is another question. Maclaren later admitted purposely creating hostile situations, presumably in a misguided attempt to generate publicity.


Rotten is done by San Francisco, playing one song, the appropriate "No Fun" and storming off saying "Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?" He didn't play with the Sex Pistols again until 1996. Sid and Nancy have their own terrible ends in the following years. Nancy tied of a stab wound to the chest, Sid the only suspect for her murder. A few months later while on bail Sid OD'd on heroin with friends from his first hit following his detox in jail at Rikers Island.

The Sex Pistols only album, Never Mind the Bollocks, Here's the Sex Pistols, is widely regarded as one of the best and most influential albums ever. However, by 2012 (12 years after this documentary), "God Save the Queen" became a part of the Olympics opening ceremony, an event opened and attended by the Queen herself. Rotten is proud of the impact the Sex Pistols had, and other than the loss of his friend he seems to have a stoic interpretation of his past with the band. But time has diluted the outrage of their behaviour and allowed it all to have been absorbed into the culture that they despised.

7 / 10


Control Room (2004)

$
0
0

Methods of information control and massive conflicts in interpretation come crashing together in this insiders view of the Coalition Media Center during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. This battleground featuring the US military versus Al Jazeera, the locally recognised but globally up and coming Qatar based Arabic news channel, becomes a microcosm for the global war of ideas. The US presumption of support and independent anti-Saddam action from the "Iraqi people" is severely put to the test. Al Jazeera's role in disseminating the news might even be the cause. Holding the unenviable position as hate figure both of the US and of Al Qaeda, the Arabic journalists attempt to be true to themselves and their countries without reflecting the bias that they see in some of their US competitors. 

The US military angle comes from Josh Rushing, a fresh faced, enthusiastic and engaging US marine. He desperately tries to communicate the American message to the Arabic world, and meets with consistent and frustrating blockages. Unlike some of his peers who are focused purely on delivering a statement and leaving the room, he wants a back and forth with the journalists, likely due to his sincere belief in the views he is expressing. His conversations with Hassan Ibrahim represent a front line of the information battle. The questions from Hassan are combative and frankly not designed to elicit an answer. Josh answers them calmly and patiently but knows his answers are not breaking through. Hassan makes the leaps of association that the Arabic world would want to, and Josh does likewise from the US perspective. Josh is alarmed and frustrated by the montages presented by Al Jazeera, showing death and destruction amid US troop movements. His reports of Saddam's brutality and suggested warcrimes are ignored. Though there are no photos or video clips of those...


The Al Jazeera reporters, produced and editors meet US updates with severe scepticism, and are consistently surprised by the coverage and lack of criticism the reports receive from western journalists. When US troops enter Baghdad's Firdos Square with a baying mob, the Al Jazeera Iraqis question where these men have come from. The accents are not Iraqi. And if this is supposed to represent the Iraqi people, why are there so few, and why are they all men between 20-30 years old? Where did they get the Iraqi flag from, the one which has not been in use for a decade? Al Jazeera are convinced they have been recruited by the US, but the western journalists don't care. There are shots of Iraqis apparently tearing up cash after ransacking a building. A western journalist even says, "Look at them tearing up their old currency!". What old currency? What new currency? Its just currency! Al Jazeera explain it. These are Kurds, they don't use southern Iraqi currency. How did they get to Baghdad?

But what is also notable is the shock and horror they feel that the US troops have made it to central Baghdad. "Where are the Iraqi military? Where are the police? Where are the Republican Guard?". They simply cannot believe that the US have already apparently won, and can't hide the hit to their pride. "What an embarrassment". A US victory is an Iraqi and Arab loss whether they agree with Saddam or not, and now the question is what happens next. A western journalist pushes a US military spokesman on why the museums have been ransacked with no protection provided. The spokesman is not of Rushing's open minded persuasion. "Our job is to provide the Iraqi people with freedom," he explains, "it is up to them to take up the reins of power". The incredulous reporter asks how these beaten people, hiding in their homes for fear of either renegade Iraqi troops, looters or US military were supposed to arrange to defend the museums when they did not know where their children's next meal would come from. The spokesman smirks.

The destruction of Al Jazeera's Baghdad headquarters by US planes is the most contentious point. Nothing will ever convince these journalists that it was an accident. They are repeatedly told of the extraordinary accuracy of US precision missiles. This was murder in retaliation for their coverage. Rushing's reaction is fascinating. He explains that the bombing was not intentional as it could not possibly have achieved the suggested aims. If they wanted to turn the media off there were methods available, technology or alienation, bombing the offices would just "turn the media up". This wasn't an intentional attack, he says, "No, I don't think so". Its obvious that he really isn't sure. 

There may never be another war like this, with a global democratic hegemon ignoring supranational authorities to invade a much smaller country. The initial invasion is over so quickly that its scarcely believable, but the war had barely begun. The information battle was lightyears behind the tanks and missiles, and so poorly coordianted that even if there had been the potential to pull an Iraqi civil society together overnight, there was no chance it would side with the invaders. This documentary is perhaps the best presentation of that conflict. Educated Arabs and Iraqis faced with unbelievable reports, many of which turn out to be true, and potentially biased western journalists instead present what they feel is necessary but in doing so reveal their own biases and resentments. I wonder if their sense of loss would have been so severe if their colleagues had not been killed. Josh now works for Al Jazereea English presenting Fault Lines. What do you expect US media's reaction to that to be?


7 / 10

Take Me To Pitcarin (2013)

$
0
0

I can't help but enjoy a personal film like this one. Julian McDonnell is a permanently, even irritatingly, cheerful 30 something with a dream. He must travel to Pitcairn Island, the home of the Bounty's mutineers. The most famous naval fugitives in history, after stranding Captain Blythe, hit a desolate rock protruding from the Pacific Ocean and they stayed there. The only current inhabitants are the 50-or-so descendants of the original 9 sailors and 18 Tahitian companions/captives. The Bounty itself was sunk to avoid identification by British naval forces, and to confirm their new home. It is one of the most remote inhabited locations in the world, thousands of miles from civilisation and entirely disconnected from traditional transportation. With no airport and no shipping lanes, the only access is via a quite dangerously operated private yacht which takes a handful of dedicated travellers and dream chasers to visit the island. Julian becomes one of them and lovingly documents the ups and downs of the trip, maintaining a remarkable sense of humour throughout.


The mutineers knew they would be hanged if they were found. Their independence was established on a rejection of authority and desire to be free, so inevitably their lives in absolute isolation were not easy. While histories are incomplete and biased, conflict was rife. Fletcher Christian adopted a remote cave as both a lookout for British ships and a hideaway in times of conflict. Captain Blythe, having been cast away, also miraculously survived a perilous journey after being stranded with limited rations in a barely seaworthy vessel, and lived to report the criminals.

Julian's journey is almost as daunting. After negotiating favourable passage, he then determines just how ramshackle, and indeed dangerous, the sole route is. His total lack of sailing skills mean he is considered an inconvenience onboard anyway and quickly he abandons the early stages of the voyage, preferring to only travel the final leg with this ramshackle crew. However, when arriving there, it becomes apparent that the boat has not made it (and may be dead in the water) and its not the first time. While waiting with no news for weeks, Julian must ask the question of whether a trip on a broken down boat to a remote rock with no help for hundreds of miles is worth it. The longer they wait, the more information seeps about regarding the history of this particular tourist route, its ups and downs and the high turnover of the ship's skeleton crew. Once the boat finally arrives, Maurice a fellow traveller and translator becomes an intermediary between the ship owner and the local police. He translates the question, "What happens if someone dies?". The answer seems to be: "burial at sea, but if its an accident there is no liability".

The parallels to both the mutineers and to Blythe himself are a lot of fun. But also the potential for misinterpretation and confusion. When it becomes clear that there are not enough berths for the perilously damaged ship to take the adventurers to the island, the question is raise of sharing beds. Maurice, the translator, says he will share with the 50-something Margo, the co-ordinator does not get the joke and takes it seriously. Before he knows it they are bunk-mates ... at least until he decides that this just isn't worth it.

The experience on the island seems somewhat anticlimactic. There really isn't anything there. On arrival they are informed that the annual festival that they thought they had missed had been rescheduled for their benefit. Its a huge coup but immediately clear that the residents delayed it since there was really no point for the few inhabitants to go ahead with it on their own. Some of the visitors find certain experiences immensely powerful, in particular visiting (or attempting to visit) Fletcher Christian's remote cave. But after a few days, boredom is the main companion. There really is nothing whatsoever to do...

In recent years the reality of the island has been quite dark. The small community living with literally nothing to do showed the rare outside visitor a simple Christian existence while bravely fighting for their survival. But below the surface there is an inevitable history of incest and disrespect for laws and social norms of the external world. Mixed with Polynesian and Tahitian sexual traditions, the outcome has been quite profoundly distateful. From one island elder, "When it comes to sex, and young people are involved, we are Polynesian first and whatever else second." In 2004 a special British court convicted half the adult male population of sexual crimes against girls aged as young as 5. Incest, gang rape and paedophilipa were the norm, at least until some women were able to obtain protection, ironically, from the British government. Incarceration is an odd concept on a remote island. A prison was built and the men sentenced, but all were freed by 2010, some serving home detention. However the question of what happens when authority is thrown off and a libertarian paradise is pursued for a few hundred years is resoundly answered in this case with a society dominated by the strong and a winner-takes-all social structure.

Julian doesn't make it to Fletcher's cave, its just too dangerous to make the climb. Its a sad outcome as after such a stressful journey, the final few steps would seem trivial. But sometimes its better to know your limits and enjoy what you have rather than risk everything by going too far. Its fitting that even as viewers we don't really get to see the cave, as the few that do make it don't have the expertise to film it properly. Even so, Julian achieves his goal, and gets a prize-winning film out of it, and for the rest of us, we know that we can leave the romance of the Bounty to the silver screen!

6 / 10

Available on youtube!


My Beautiful Broken Brain (2014)

$
0
0

A painful and at times overwhelming personal portrayal resulting in a "narrative structure" for a patient to "understand her own journey". A challenge to the nature of reality through the eyes of someone who's reality twisted painfully yet magnificently. This is the story of Lotje Sodderland an energetic young woman who suffered a catastrophic stroke leaving her lost in a mess of colour, confusion, vomit and faeces and had to relearn skills to interpret the world around her.

We take this journey with her largely through iterating over language skills and attempting to match that language back to the real world, but also through a bombardment of colour and noise designed to represent her own confusion and her attempts to reinterpret the new, unfamiliar signals sent by her own brain. Like many of these mental illness documentaries we are spurred forward by self directed footage drowning in personal vulnerability as Lotje desparately tries to explain to us and to herself what has changed without the vocabulary to do so. We are also left with the realisation that the "real world" is little more that own our interpretation of a mess of noise and colour that our own brain reconfigures for us. Given that everyone we interact with has the same form of brain, does that mean we cannot see beyond our own collective consciousness? David Lynch certainly thinks so.

As the movie progresses she takes steps forward and steps backward but at all times her increasingly familiar smiling face and prominent supermodel-esque upperlip beauty spot meet us with resounding positivity and hope. Even in her darkest moments she prefers to express failures with apologies and giggles rather than defeatedness or sorrow. The credits roll over Nina Simone's "Je ne me quitte pas" to remind us that individual resolve may be the primary force between us as individuals and total loss. Thank you Lotje!

7 / 10




Viewing all 48 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images